And like most anti-choicers you have kept yourself ignorant of the basic facts about abortion and the laws surrounding it.
it is common to grant a stay until more information, and time
This is the oldest trick in the book to push women outside the window of opportunity when abortion is still legal and safe.
Give me a break!
Parker,
You should be happy! This is a victory for that woman's civil liberties!
But instead, you focus on your personal feelings and wrap yourself around the axle trying to be accusatory instead of objective.
You take one piece of information, regardless of accuracy, and use it to fuel your anger instead of making a valid point.
There are times when you often discredit your arguments, assumptions, and aspirations with premises that are important and sincere, but lack coherence and clarity.
As directed from an earlier Federal Court ruling, the female prisoner in Missouri will be provided with transportation, security, and sufficient time to travel to a clinic in order to receive an abortion. The abortion itself will not be paid for by state dollars, just the logistical expenses. Her civil rights trump logistical expenses, as it should.
Is that the best you can do?
No acknowledgment that justice was done?
No reflection that the Diary you cited was premature in nature and taken out of context?
No admission that using that Diary without checking for an update (or correct account) could mislead other readers?
No acceptance of the truth, no matter how much it hurts?
...then you have the audacity that to demand that play I step and fetchit that a mistrail of justice that should never have happened in the first place...because idiots like you (anti-choicers) want to play god with womens lives...
Hell no, it is like praising a rapist for not anally raping me ...
I needed a good laugh today, thanks Parker!
Your tunnel-vision approach when giving a response is ridiculously funny!
Absurd!
